4.5 Article

The Use of a Novel Three-Electrode Impulse Underwater Discharge for the Synthesis of W-Mo Mixed Oxide Nanocomposites

期刊

PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 191-209

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11090-021-10213-3

关键词

Plasma; Three-electrode impulse underwater discharge; Mixed oxide nanoparticles; Photocatalytic activity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of Russia [0092-2019-0003]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [21-73-00034]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-73-00034] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized a novel three-electrode underwater pulse discharge to synthesize W-Mo mixed oxide nanoparticles, demonstrating that the composition of the particles can be controlled by adjusting the discharge current. Characterization techniques such as X-ray diffraction spectroscopy and electron microscopy were used to analyze the chemical composition and morphology of the particles, while the photocatalytic performance was evaluated through the degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light irradiation conditions.
The novel three-electrode underwater pulse discharge excited by two independent high-voltage sources was used for the synthesis of W-Mo mixed oxide nanoparticles for the first time. The spectral and optical characteristics of the discharge were studied. It was found that the composition of the formed mixed oxides particles can be controlled by the discharge current between the anodes-general cathode pair. The chemical composition and morphology of obtained particles were studied by using X-ray diffraction spectroscopy and electron microscopy. The dynamic light scattering was used to measure the average particle diameter and zeta-potential. The photocatalytic performance of mixed oxides nanoparticles was estimated through the degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light irradiation conditions. It was found that the composition of the nanoparticles affects the photocatalytic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据