4.7 Article

Potassium signaling in plant abiotic responses: Crosstalk with calcium and reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 110-121

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.016

关键词

Potassium transport systems; Calcium sensors; Reactive oxygen species; Abiotic stress; Signal molecule; Crosstalk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072559, 31860568, 31560563, 31160398]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFD1000800]
  3. Research Fund of Higher Education of Gansu, China [2018C-14, 2019B-082]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China [1606RJZA073, 1606RJZA077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium ion is an essential signaling molecule in plant growth and development. It interacts with calcium, reactive oxygen species, and reactive nitrogen species to regulate plant growth, development, and abiotic stress responses.
Potassium ion (K+) has been regarded as an essential signaling in plant growth and development. K+ transporters and channels at transcription and protein levels have been made great progress. K+ can enhance plant abiotic stress resistance. Meanwhile, it is now clear that calcium (Ca2(+)), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) act as signaling molecules in plants. They regulate plant growth and development and mediate K+ transport. However, the interaction of K+ with these signaling molecules remains unclear. K+ may crosstalk with Ca2(+) and ROS/RNS in abiotic stress responses in plants. Also, there are interactions among K+, Ca2(+), and ROS/RNS signaling pathways in plant growth, development, and abiotic stress responses. They regulate ion homeostasis, antioxidant system, and stress resistance-related gene expression in plants. Future work needs to focus on the deeper understanding of molecular mechanism of crosstalk among K+, Ca2(+), and ROS/RNS under abiotic stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据