4.0 Article

Magnetic Nanoparticles Obtained by Electrophysical Technique: Focus on Biomedical Applications

期刊

PHYSICS OF THE SOLID STATE
卷 63, 期 10, 页码 1447-1461

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1063783421090237

关键词

magnetic nanoparticles; iron oxides; ferrogels; electrical explocion of the wire; laser evaporation; spark discharge method; film nanostructures; detectors of weak magnetic fields; magnetic impedance; bioapplications

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-19-00090]
  2. Spanish Government [MAT2017-83631-C3-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the possibilities of producing large batches of magnetic nanoparticles using various methods, focusing on synthesis, certification, and interaction with biological systems in bioapplications. Analysis of biological experiments and theoretical approaches show potential for highly sensitive film sensors in biomedical applications.
The possibilities of producing large batches of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) using electrical explocion of the wire (EEW), laser target evaporation, and spark discharge are considered. MNP bioapplications require production of magnetic materials in the form of as stabilized aqueous suspensions or hydrogels with magnetic fillers; therefore, some details of synthesis of these materials and their certification are discussed. The problems of the interaction of MNPs with biological systems, biocompatibility, the applicability of ferrogel substrata to cellular technology and regenerative medicine, and as biomimetics in the development of magnetic biosensors are considered. The results of analysis of some biological experiments with various suspensions prepared based on the same MNP batch are presented. An analysis of the examples of magnetic biodetection and existing theoretical approaches will allow estimation of prospects of this scientific direction to develop highly sensitive film sensors based on the giant magnetic impedance effect for biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据