4.4 Article

Effects of electron cyclotron heating on the toroidal flow in LHD plasmas

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0057344

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K03582]
  2. National Institute for Fusion Science grant [NIFS10ULHH021]
  3. NIFS Collaboration Research program [NIFS19KNST150]
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT under KFE R&D Program of KSTAR Experimental Collaboration and Fusion Plasma Research [KFE-EN2101-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the toroidal force related to ECH in LHD plasmas and finds that the force generated by ECH is comparable to that generated by NBI heating. The experimentally observed directions of the forces are consistent with the calculated results.
The toroidal force related to electron cyclotron heating (ECH) is investigated in large helical device (LHD) plasmas. When we apply the ECH to the plasma kept by neutral beam injection (NBI) heating, the radial profile of the toroidal flow velocity changes drastically in LHD. ECH-generated supra-thermal electrons can apply forces on the plasma through radial electron current and collisions. We investigate the perturbed electron distribution due to ECH by using the GNET code, which can solve the 5D drift kinetic equation. We also evaluate the electromagnetic force due to radial current and the collisional force driven by ECH. As a result, we find a comparable force driven by ECH to that by NBI heating. The direction of the force is the counter (co) direction radially inside (outside) from the ECH heating location, and these directions correspond with that of experiment results. Finally, we evaluate toroidal flows in ECH and NBI heated plasma solving the radial diffusion equation and compare them with that of experimental observations. We reproduce the co-rotating toroidal flow quantitatively in the balanced-NBI+ECH heated case, but we see a difference in the toroidal flow profiles in the co-NBI+ECH heated case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据