4.4 Article

Energy dissipation in turbulent reconnection

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0071015

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC21K1458, 80NSSC21K0739]
  2. MMS [NASA NNX14AC39, 80NSSC19K0565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that at reconnection sites, pressure-strain shows a signature of internal energy conversion; the electron heating rate is larger than the ion heating rate in all cases considered, with compressive heating dominant. The pressure-strain interaction can be used as an independent measure of energy conversion and dynamics in reconnection regions.
We study the nature of pressure-strain interaction at reconnection sites detected by NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission. We employ data from a series of previously published case studies, including a large-scale reconnection event at the magnetopause, three small-scale reconnection events at the magnetosheath current sheets, and one example of the recently discovered electron-only reconnection. In all instances, we find that the pressure-strain shows a signature of conversion into (or from) internal energy at the reconnection site. The electron heating rate is larger than the ion heating rate and the compressive heating is dominant over the incompressive heating rate in all cases considered. The magnitude of thermal energy conversion rate is close to the electromagnetic energy conversion rate in the reconnection region. Although in most cases the pressure-strain interaction indicates that the particle internal energy is increasing, in one case, the internal energy is decreasing. These observations indicate that the pressure-strain interaction can be used as an independent measure of energy conversion and dynamics in reconnection regions, in particular, independent of measures based on the electromagnetic work. Finally, we explore a selected reconnection site in a turbulent Particle-in-Cell simulation which further supports the observational results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据