4.4 Article

Understanding how minority relativistic electron populations may dominate charge state balance and radiative cooling of a post-thermal quench tokamak plasma

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0071996

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy through the Magnetic Fusion Theory Program
  2. Tokamak Disruption Simulation (TDS) SciDAC project at Los Alamos National Laboratory [89233218CNA000001]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Los Alamos National Laboratory [20200356ER]
  4. R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE) - Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea [KFE-EN2141-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the phenomenon of minority relativistic electron populations in complex plasmas, particularly in tokamak plasma discharges with runaway electrons. The research finds that the relativistic enhancement of electron impact inelastic cross sections has significant effects on ion charge state distributions, radiation, and spectral characteristics.
Minority relativistic electron populations can occur in a range of complex plasmas. Of specific interest is when runaway electrons form among the presence of high-atomic-number ion species in a tokamak plasma discharge. It has been recently demonstrated that ion charge state distributions and radiation losses at low bulk electron temperatures can be dominated by relativistic electrons, even though their density is orders of magnitude lower. This was attributed to the relativistic enhancement of electron impact inelastic cross sections. In this work, we provide a closer inspection of the atomic physics underpinning this effect. We also demonstrate the consequences of runaway enhanced scattering on post-disruption tokamak fusion discharges with neon and argon impurities present. Effects on charge state distributions, radiation and spectral characteristics, and reduced-order modeling considerations are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据