4.7 Article

Numerical simulation of flow over flapping wings in tandem: Wingspan effects

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0080376

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Research Agency of Spain (AEI) from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [DPI2016-76151-C2-2-R]
  2. Red Espanola de Supercomputacion [IM-2019-3-0011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of aspect ratio on the flow and aerodynamic performance of a pair of wings in horizontal tandem configuration through direct numerical simulations. The results show that the aerodynamic performance of the forewing remains unchanged regardless of the aspect ratio of the hindwing, while the hindwing is clearly affected by the interaction with the forewing's trailing edge vortex.
We report direct numerical simulations of a pair of wings in horizontal tandem configuration to analyze the effect of their aspect ratio on the flow and the aerodynamic performance of the system. The wings are immersed in a uniform free stream at the Reynolds number Re = 1000, and they undergo heaving and pitching oscillation with the Strouhal number St = 0.7. The aspect ratios of forewing and hindwing vary between 2 and 4. The aerodynamic performance of the system is dictated by the interaction between the trailing edge vortex (TEV) shed by the forewing and the induced leading-edge vortex formed on the hindwing. The aerodynamic performance of the forewing is similar to that of an isolated wing irrespective of the aspect ratio of the hindwing, with a small modulating effect produced by the forewing-hindwing interactions. On the other hand, the aerodynamic performance of the hindwing is clearly affected by the interaction with the forewing's TEV. Tandem configurations with a larger aspect ratio on the forewing than on the hindwing result in a quasi-two-dimensional flow structure on the latter. This yields an 8% increase in the time-averaged thrust coefficient of the hindwing, with no change in its propulsive efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据