4.7 Article

More indications for lepton nonuniversality in b → sl+l-

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 824, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136838

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cluster of Excellence Preci-sion Physics, Fundamental Interactions, and Structure of Matter [PRISMA+ EXC 2118/1]
  2. German Research Foun-dation (DFG) within the German Excellence Strategy [39083149]
  3. BMBF [05H2018]
  4. Xunta de Galicia
  5. European Union ERDF
  6. Maria de Maeztu Units of Excellence pro-gram [MDM-2016-0692]
  7. Spanish Research State Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study by the LHCb collaboration confirms evidence for lepton flavour nonuniversality through updated measurements of R-K at a 3.1 Sigma level. Projections for future measurements suggest that LHCb may discover lepton nonuniversality in a single observable with Run 3 data. The study also analyzes other ratios and their ability to differentiate between various new physics options within effective field theory. Additionally, deviations in the ratios are compared with NP indications in angular observables of exclusive b -> sll transitions.
Recently the LHCb collaboration has confirmed the evidence for lepton flavour nonuniversality at the 3.1 Sigma level via an updated measurement of R-K. In this work we analyse this evidence within a model independent approach. We make projections for future measurements which indicate that LHCb will be in the position to discover lepton nonuniversality with the Run 3 data in a single observable. We analyse other ratios based on our analysis of the present measurements of the ratios R-K((*)) and analyse if they are able to differentiate between various new physics options within the effective field theory at present or in the near future. We also compare the present deviations in the ratios with NP indications in the angular observables of exclusive b -> sll transitions. Finally, we update our global analysis considering all b -> sll observables altogether, including a 20-parameter fit in connection of a Wilks' test. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据