4.7 Article

Transition probabilities in 31P and 31S: A test for isospin symmetry

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 821, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136603

关键词

Mirror nuclei; Lifetime measurements; Transition probabilities; Isospin symmetry; Microscopic multiphonon model

资金

  1. Bulgarian Science Fund [08/6]
  2. Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The excited states in mirror nuclei P-31 and S-31 were studied in the reaction Ne-20 + C-12, with angular correlations and Doppler-shift attenuation lifetime measurements. The experimental results showed that the breaking of isospin symmetry in the A = 31 mass region was strongly supported by the isoscalar component in the observed B(E1) strengths, accounting for 24% of the isovector one.
Excited states in the mirror nuclei P-31 and S-31 were populated in the 1p and 1n exit channels of the reaction Ne-20 + C-12, at a beam energy of 33 MeV. The Ne-20 beam was delivered for the first time by the Piave-Alpi accelerator of the Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro. Angular correlations of coincident gamma-rays and Doppler-shift attenuation lifetime measurements were performed using the multi-detector array GASP in conjunction with the EUCLIDES charged particle detector. In the observed B(E1) strengths, the isoscalar component, amounting to 24% of the isovector one, provides strong evidence for breaking of the isospin symmetry in the A = 31 mass region. Self-consistent beyond mean field calculations using Equation of Motion method based on a chiral potential and including two- and three-body forces reproduce well the experimental B(E1) strengths, reinforcing our conclusion. Coherent mixing from higher-lying states involving the Giant Isovector Monopole Resonance accounts well for the effect observed. The breaking of the isospin symmetry originates from the violation of the charge symmetry of the two- and three-body parts of the potential, only related to the Coulomb interaction. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据