4.5 Article

Superfluidity of vacancies in solid 4He

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS A
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127777

关键词

Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer condensation; Pairing of vacancies; Solid He-4; Superfluidity of vacancies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10174024, 10474025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a superfluid state of vacancy motion in solid He-4, where vacancies sense an attractive effective interaction by exchanging virtual longitudinal acoustic phonons, leading to a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) condensation state. This first-order phase transition results in dressed vacancies and vacancy pairs, with the critical temperature potentially being the transition temperature of the supersolid state. The low-temperature expressions of vacancy heat capacity and vacancy number density in the BCS condensation state are derived.
Under the adiabatic approximation, we present a superfluid state of vacancy motion in solid He-4. The vacancies in solid He-4 can sense an attractive effective interaction by exchange of virtual longitudinal acoustic phonons. Such an interaction leads to a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) condensation state, in which the vacancies with opposite wave vectors are bound into pairs and single, unpaired bare vacancies are transformed into a new kind of quasiparticle, the dressed vacancy. A dressed vacancy is a vacancy clothed with a cloud of virtual longitudinal-acoustic phonons. The vacancy system undergoes a first-order phase transition from the normal state to the BCS condensation state. The critical temperature may be the transition temperature of the supersolid state. We derive the low-temperature expressions of vacancy heat capacity and vacancy number density in the BCS condensation state. The BCS condensation state of vacancies is the superfluid state of vacancies, which possesses potentially important and novel effects in condensed matter physics. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据