4.8 Article

Jamming Distance Dictates Colloidal Shear Thickening

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.158002

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1804462, DMR-2104726]
  2. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (ACS-PRF) [59208-DNI9]
  3. North Carolina State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental and computational observations reveal that the shear thickening strength scales exponentially with the scaled deficit contact number and the scaled jamming distance. Rough colloids require fewer particle contacts than smooth colloids to achieve the same shear thickening strength due to enhanced geometric friction from surface roughness. The surface roughness does not lead to significant changes in free volume near the jamming point for rough colloids.
We report experimental and computational observations of dynamic contact networks for colloidal suspensions undergoing shear thickening. The dense suspensions are comprised of sterically stabilized poly (methyl methacrylate) colloids that are spherically symmetric and have varied surface roughness. Confocal rheometry and dissipative particle dynamics simulations show that the shear thickening strength beta scales exponentially with the scaled deficit contact number and the scaled jamming distance. Rough colloids, which experience additional rotational constraints, require an average of 1.5-2 fewer particle contacts as compared to smooth colloids, in order to generate the same beta. This is because the surface roughness enhances geometric friction in such a way that the rough colloids do not experience a large change in the free volume near the jamming point. The available free volume for colloids of different roughness is related to the deficiency from the maximum number of nearest neighbors at jamming under shear. Our results further suggest that the force per contact is different for particles with different morphologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据