4.8 Article

Tracking the Ionization Site in Neutral Molecules

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.213201

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Atomic, Molecular and Optical Sciences Program [DE-SC0022093]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0022093] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a method to quantify the relative contributions of two processes under intense light exposure. Experimental results show that electrons are primarily ionized from the downfield atom when subjecting N2 to strong field ionization. This suggests that the bound state wave function mainly evolves adiabatically in the laser field, although ionization enhancement process still plays a role.
When a diatomic molecule is exposed to intense light, the valence electron may tunnel from a higher potential (corresponding to an upfield atom) due to the suppressed internuclear barrier. This process is known as ionization enhancement and is a key mechanism in strong field ionization of molecules. Alternatively, the bound electron wave function can evolve adiabatically in the laser field, resulting in ionization from the downfield atom. Here, we introduce a method to quantify the relative contribution of these two processes. Applying this method to experimentally measured electron momenta distributions following strong field ionization of N2 with infrared laser light, we find approximately a 2 : 1 ratio of electrons ionized from a downfield atom, relative to upfield. This suggests that the bound state wave function largely adapts adiabatically to the changing laser field, although the nonadiabatic process of ionization enhancement still contributes even in neutral molecules. Our method can be applied to any diatomic neutral molecule to better understand the evolution of the initially bound electron wave packet and hence the nature of the molecular ionization process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据