4.8 Article

Galactic Potential and Dark Matter Density from Angular Stellar Accelerations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.241104

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE [DESC0007968]
  2. DOE Early Career Award [DESC0019225]
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DEAC02-05CH11231]
  4. Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DEAC02-05CH11231]
  5. MIT Department of Physics Pappalardo Fellowship
  6. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF2-51470.001-A]
  7. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Subatomic Physics Discovery Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new method for measuring the Milky Way potential using the angular accelerations of stars in aggregate. The findings suggest that it is possible to measure the potential of the MW disk and the local dark matter density at different significance levels. In the future, combining different astronomical surveys may lead to precise measurements of the local dark matter density and the shape of its density profile.
We present an approach to measure the Milky Way (MW) potential using the angular accelerations of stars in aggregate as measured by astrometric surveys like Gaia. Accelerations directly probe the gradient of the MW potential, as opposed to indirect methods using, e.g., stellar velocities. We show that end-of mission Gaia stellar acceleration data may be used to measure the potential of the MW disk at approximately 3 sigma significance and, if recent measurements of the solar acceleration are included, the local dark matter density at similar to 2 sigma significance. Since the significance of detection scales steeply as t(5/2) for observing time t, future surveys that include angular accelerations in the astrometric solutions may be combined with Gaia to precisely measure the local dark matter density and shape of the density profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据