4.6 Article

Empirical LiK excited state potentials: connecting short range and near dissociation expansions

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 3933-3940

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp04707h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Ministers Office, Singapore
  2. Ministry of Education, Singapore under the Research Centres of Excellence program
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [MOE2015-T2-1-098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a high-resolution spectroscopic survey of (LiK)-Li-6-K-40 compounds, providing an empirical representation for the B-1 pi potential. The identified suitable vibrational state is significant for coherent Raman transfer and the creation of a molecular gas with dipolar interactions.
We report on a high-resolution spectroscopic survey of (LiK)-Li-6-K-40 molecules near the 2S + 4P dissociation threshold and produce a fully empirical representation for the B-1 pi potential by connecting available short- and long-range data. The purpose is to identify a suitable intermediate state for a coherent Raman transfer to the absolute ground state, and the creation of a molecular gas with dipolar interactions. Starting from weakly bound ultracold Feshbach molecules, the transition frequencies to twenty-six vibrational states are determined. Our data are combined with long-range measurements [Ridinger et al., EPL, 2011, 96, 33001], and near-dissociation expansions for the spin-orbit coupled potentials are fitted to extract the van der Waals C-6 dispersion coefficients. A suitable vibrational level is identified by resolving its Zeeman structure and by comparing the experimentally attained g-factor to our theoretical prediction. Using mass-scaling of the short-range data for the B-1 pi [Pashov et al., Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 292, 615620] and an updated value for its depth, we model the short- and the long-range data simultaneously and produce a Rydberg-Klein-Rees curve covering the entire range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据