4.4 Review

Defects and Reliability of GaN-Based LEDs: Review and Perspectives

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202100727

关键词

defects; degradation; diffusion; gallium nitride (GaN); indium; light-emitting diodes

资金

  1. European Union [101007319]
  2. Universita degli Studi di Padova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the main factors and mechanisms that limit the reliability of gallium nitride (GaN)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs). It provides an overview of the relevant defects characterization techniques for wide-bandgap diodes, and presents a catalogue of traps and deep levels in GaN along with computer-aided simulations to identify the defects that negatively affect the radiative efficiency of the devices. The paper also analyzes gradual degradation mechanisms and examines the commonly used lifetime estimation methods and standards for solid-state luminaires. Additionally, it discusses the typical degradation and failure mechanisms exhibited by LEDs under electrical overstress.
Herein, the main factors and mechanisms that limit the reliability of gallium nitride (GaN)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are reviewed. An overview of the defects characterization techniques most relevant for wide-bandgap diodes is provided first. Then, by introducing a catalogue of traps and deep levels in GaN and computer-aided simulations, it is shown which types of defects are more detrimental for the radiative efficiency of the devices. Gradual degradation mechanisms are analyzed in terms of their specific driving force: a separate analysis of recombination-enhanced processes, driven by nonradiative recombination and/or temperature-assisted processes, such as defects or impurity diffusion, is presented. The most common lifetime estimation methods and standards adopted for solid-state luminaires are also reported on. Finally, the paper concludes by examining which are the typical degradation and failure mechanisms exhibited by LEDs submitted to electrical overstress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据