4.4 Article

Ultrathin Bifacial Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell with Inverted Pyramid Textures

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.202100481

关键词

bifacial structures; high-performance solar cells; inverted pyramid; PERC; ultrathin silicon wafers

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61774069, 11834011, 11974242, 62034009]
  2. Major projects of Natural Science Foundation of universities in Jiangsu Province [20KJA430013]
  3. 333 Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Education Department
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201027]
  6. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_2930, KYCX21_3139]
  7. Lianyungang Haiyan Plan [2020-QD-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the design and performance of a novel ultrathin bifacial PERC solar cell with an inverted pyramid texture on a flexible silicon wafer. Through PC1D simulation, a maximum efficiency of 23.44% was achieved, showcasing improved output performance compared to traditional cells.
Wafer thinning is a crucial technique for high-efficiency solar cells. Herein, an inverted pyramid (IP) texture is prepared on a 35 mu m-thick flexible silicon (Si) wafer with a standard area of 156 x 156 mm(2). Based on the experimental results, an ultrathin bifacial passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) with IP textures using PC1D simulation is designed. The influence of wafer thickness, IP texture, bifacial structure, thickness of the antireflection coating, and doping concentration on device performance is investigated. The results show that the ultrathin IP-based bifacial PERC possesses better output performance than the traditional cell. Finally, a simulated maximum efficiency of 23.44% is obtained using PC1D software, with an open-circuit voltage of 0.7127 V and a short-circuit current of 9.272 A. This ultrathin PERC with IP textures provides an effective way to improve the efficiency of ultrathin silicon solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据