4.5 Article

Temperature and inhomogeneity combination effects on collective excitations in three-layer graphene structures

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2022.115201

关键词

Collective excitations; Inhomogeneity effects; Multilayer graphene; Temperature effects

资金

  1. Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) [C2021-16-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of temperature and the inhomogeneity of background dielectric on collective excitations in a multilayer graphene structure. The results indicate that temperature affects the acoustic plasmon frequency and the optical plasmon frequency in different ways. Additionally, temperature causes energy loss in the plasmon modes, even outside the single-particle excitation region. The inhomogeneity of background dielectric reduces plasmon energy and damping rate, as well as the influence of temperature and interlayer separation on collective excitations.
Temperature and the inhomogeneity of background dielectric combination effects on the collective excitations in a multilayer graphene structure consisting of three monolayer graphene sheets are investigated, within the random-phase approximation. Numerical calculations present that three weakly damped plasmon modes exist and continue in inter single-particle excitation region. Our investigations show that as temperature increases, the acoustic plasmon frequencies slightly decrease and then increase after getting the lowest peak. Dissimilarly, the optical plasmon frequency increases with the increasing temperature in the large wave vector regions. Besides, temperature effects cause the energy loss to plasmon modes even nearby the Dirac points, outside the single-particle excitation region of the system. We also observe that the inhomogeneity of background dielectric declines the plasmon energy, the damping rate of plasma oscillations, and the effects of temperature and interlayer separation on the collective excitations in the system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据