4.5 Article

Structural, optical, and dielectric properties for Mg0.6Cu0.2Ni0.2Cr2O4 chromite spinel

期刊

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 624, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2021.413439

关键词

Sol-gel method; Mg0.6Cu0.2Ni0.2Cr2O4 chromite; Structural analysis; Optical properties; Conductivity; Impedance

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University [2020/01/16565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the structural, optical, and dielectric properties of the Mg0.6Cu0.2Ni0.2Cr2O4 chromite sample prepared by sol-gel process. The synthesized chromite showed a lower direct band gap energy and appropriate absorption rate in the visible light region, with conduction process described using NSPT and CBH models. The behavior of dielectric constants was interpreted based on Maxwell-Wagner's theory of interfacial polarization.
In this work, the structural, optical, and dielectric properties for Mg0.6Cu0.2Ni0.2Cr2O4 chromite sample prepared by sol-gel process were investigated. The XRD characterization for this sample confirmed the development of the face-centered cubic spinel structure with Fd (3) over barm space group. From the UV-Vis optical absorbance, the synthesized chromite shows significantly lower direct band gap energy and has an appropriate absorption rate in the visible light region. The variations of penetration depth, extinction coefficient, refractive coefficient, dispersion energy parameters, and dielectric permittivity constants were also interpreted. The Non-Overlapping Small Polaron Tunneling (NSPT) and the Correlated Barrier Hopping (CBH) are the suitable models to describe the conduction process for the prepared sample. The behavior of dielectric constants has been interpreted based on the Maxwell-Wagner's theory of interfacial polarization. The behavior of imaginary part of impedance (Z '') shows a dielectric-relaxation phenomenon in the sample with activation energies near to those determined from the conductivity study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据