4.6 Article

Transposable elements promote the evolution of genome streamlining

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0477

关键词

lineage selection; non-transitive interactions; sex; horizontal gene transfer; spatial structure; altruism

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB1182]
  2. Max-Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TEs are believed to drive genome expansion in eukaryotes, but prokaryotes have streamlined genomes. Using a simulation model, this study found that TEs can promote genome streamlining by local interactions and rock-paper-scissors dynamics. Streamlining is maladaptive to individual cells, but hinders TE proliferation and improves lineage viability.
Eukaryotes and prokaryotes have distinct genome architectures, with marked differences in genome size, the ratio of coding/non-coding DNA, and the abundance of transposable elements (TEs). As TEs replicate independently of their hosts, the proliferation of TEs is thought to have driven genome expansion in eukaryotes. However, prokaryotes also have TEs in intergenic spaces, so why do prokaryotes have small, streamlined genomes? Using an in silico model describing the genomes of single-celled asexual organisms that coevolve with TEs, we show that TEs acquired from the environment by horizontal gene transfer can promote the evolution of genome streamlining. The process depends on local interactions and is underpinned by rock-paper-scissors dynamics in which populations of cells with streamlined genomes beat TEs, which beat non-streamlined genomes, which beat streamlined genomes, in continuous and repeating cycles. Streamlining is maladaptive to individual cells, but improves lineage viability by hindering the proliferation of TEs. Streamlining does not evolve in sexually reproducing populations because recombination partially frees TEs from the deleterious effects they cause. This article is part of the theme issue 'The secret lives of microbial mobile genetic elements'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据