4.5 Article

Optimized deep learning model assisted pressure transient analysis for automatic reservoir characterization

期刊

PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 659-677

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2021.2007122

关键词

Adam optimization; deep learning; reservoir characterization; long short-term memory; pressure drawdown test

资金

  1. Oil Industry Development Board, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Government of India [4/3/2020-OIDB]
  2. DIT University [Department of Petroleum and Energy Studies] [DITU/R D/2021/4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An optimized deep learning model has been proposed for automatic interpretation of pressure drawdown tests, achieving high accuracy in predicting parameters from pressure data with minimized manual intervention.
An optimized deep learning model consisting of long short-term memory and fully connected neural networks has been proposed for the automatic interpretation of constant rate pressure drawdown tests conducted in infinite acting homogeneous reservoirs. The pressure change and pressure derivative data along with their corresponding log (C(D)e(2S)) value has been used for training purpose. The hyper-parameter tuning has been conducted to obtain 80:10:10 data split ratio, batch size of 64, Adam optimization algorithm, learning rate of 0.01, and 100000 dataset size as the most suitable choices for training the model. The mean relative errors of 0.0034, 0.0042, and 0.0046 and mean absolute errors of 0.0438, 0.0556, and 0.0585 have been obtained for the train, validation, and test data, respectively, during training. The performance of the trained model has been validated using simulated data for six pressure drawdown test cases. The minimum and maximum absolute errors of 0.0110 and 0.0813, respectively, have been obtained for the test cases. The proposed model provides high accuracy in predicting log (C(D)e(2S)) from pressure change and pressure derivative data input for noisy data as well, with minimized manual intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据