4.7 Article

Effect of Illicium verum (Hook) essential oil on cholinesterase and locomotor activity of Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer)

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.105027

关键词

Vegetable essential oil; AChE inhibition; Locomotor behavior; Bioinsecticide; Biochemical mechanisms

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brazil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to test the insecticidal effect of Illicium verum essential oil on the pest Alphitobius diaperinus. The results showed that the essential oil can be used as an alternative to conventional insecticides.
The aim of this work was to test the insecticidal effect of the essential oil of Illicium verum (Hook) by observing the survival, biochemical parameters (acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, glutathione s-transferase (GST) activity and the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS)) and locomotor capacity of the Coleoptera Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer), a pest of beef poultry. The sublethal concentrations (100% survival of A. diaperinus during 96 h of exposure) of I. verum essential oil selected for analysis were 0.5% and 1%. The selected sublethal concentrations did not show significant increases in ROS levels after 24 h of exposure to the essential oil. However, increases in GST activity were seen following exposure to 0.5% I. verum essential oil, while decreases in AChE activity were observed following exposure to concentrations of 0.5% and 1%. These results correlate with the observed behavior of A. diaperinus; when placed into an arena, these insects typically demonstrate aversion to stimuli and refuge-seeking behavior. Following exposure to 0.5% I. verum essential oil, the insects showed loss of refuge-seeking capacity and, following exposure to a concentration of 1%, loss of locomotor capacity. Overall, these results indicate that I. verum essential oil can be used as an alternative to conventional insecticides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据