4.6 Review

Antibiotics in critically ill children-a narrative review on different aspects of a rational approach

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 440-446

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01878-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stiftung Universitatsmedizin
  2. Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (IFORES program)
  3. Stiftung Universitatsmedizin Essen
  4. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Critically ill children are at risk of harm from antibiotic overtreatment, caused by the fear of missing severe bacterial infections. Antibiotic stewardship programs can help guide appropriate antibiotic therapy to reduce harm and improve outcomes. Timely and targeted antibiotic treatment is crucial for managing infections in critically ill children.
Especially critically ill children are exposed to antibiotic overtreatment, mainly caused by the fear of missing out a severe bacterial infection. Potential adverse effects and selection of multi-drug resistant bacteria play minor roles in decision making. This narrative review first describes harm from antibiotics and second focuses on different aspects that could help to reduce antibiotic overtreatment without harming the patient: harm from antibiotic treatment, diagnostic approaches, role of biomarkers, timing of antibiotic therapy, empiric therapy, targeted therapy, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Wherever possible, we linked the described evidence to the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Antibiotic stewardship programs should help guiding antibiotic therapy for critically ill children. Impact Critically ill children can be harmed by inadequate or overuse of antibiotics. Hemodynamically unstable children with a suspicion of infection should be immediately treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. In contrast, in hemodynamically stable children with sepsis and organ dysfunction, a time frame of 3 h for proper diagnostics may be adequate before starting antibiotics if necessary. Less and more targeted antibiotic treatment can be achieved via antibiotic stewardship programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据