4.5 Article

14-3-3ζ promoted invasion and lymph node metastasis of breast invasive ductal carcinoma with HER2 overexpression

期刊

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153619

关键词

14-3-3 zeta; HER2; TGF-beta; Breast; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Metastasis

资金

  1. Key Science and Technology Project of Zigong [2018SHFZ11]
  2. Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Medical Association [S18061]
  3. Key Science and Technology Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Zigong [201828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that the co-overexpression of 14-3-3 and HER2 in breast cancer could enhance the occurrence, development, and lymph node metastasis of the cancer, suggesting it may impact the treatment decisions and prognosis of breast cancer.
Background: HER2 was a recognized oncogene that promoted the development and metastasis of breast cancer, but its positive expression rate in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was much lower than that in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The correlation between the occurrence and development of breast cancer and the amplification and over expression of HER2 gene alone was still controversial. 14-3-3 zeta had a strong protein binding ability and a variety of functions, mainly through the interaction with other proteins to exert its unique biological activities. However, influence and interaction relationship of the two proteins on the development of IDC was not clear. Furthermore, the mutual effect mechanism of synergy effect on lymph node metastasis of IDC was not known well too. Methods: Immunohistochemistry experiment was performed to detect expression status of 14-3-3 zeta, HER2, TGF-beta, p53 and Gli2 in paraffin-embedded samples respectively, including 30 cases of normal breast tissue, 30 cases of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), 30 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 30 cases of DCIS and 120 cases of IDC. Results: The positive expression rates of 14-3-3 zeta/HER2 in Normal group, UDH group, ADH group, DCIS group and IDC group were 30%/0.00%, 26.7%/0.00%, 53.3%/33.3%, 46.7%/53.3% and 50%/24.2%, respectively. Compared with Normal group or UDH group, the expression of 14-3-3 zeta was significantly increased in ADH, DCIS and IDC groups. 14-3-3 zeta was overexpressed in only 4 of the 16 DCIS cases with HER2 overexpression (25.0%, 4/16), but it was overexpressed in 7 of the 9 IDC cases with DCIS (77.8%, 7/9). Among HER2 overexpression cases, 14-3-3 zeta over expression was significantly different between DCIS group and IDC with DCIS group (P = 0.017). In 18 IDC cases with lymph node metastasis and HER2 overexpression, 14-3-3 zeta was overexpressed in 15 cases (83.3%, 15/18), while in the 11 IDC cases without lymph node metastasis, 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 were overexpressed in only 5 cases (45.5%, 5/11). Co-overexpression of 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 was positively correlated with occurrence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.048). TGF-beta was overexpressed in both precancerous lesion group and IDC group compared with normal group. Compared with the IDC group without lymph node metastasis, TGF-beta expression was significantly increased in the IDC group with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.015). In IDC cases with 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 co-overexpression, the expression of p53 in IDC with lymph node metastasis was significantly decreased (P = 0.010), while the expression of Gli2 was significantly increased compared with IDC cases without lymph node metastasis (P = 0.038). The co-overexpression of 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 was positively correlated with ER negative expression (P < 0.001) and PR negative expression (P = 0.038), respectively. Conclusion: 14-3-3 zeta synergistic with HER2 could promote the occurrence and development of breast IDC and induce the lymph node metastasis of IDC, suggesting that combined overexpression of 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 would lead to higher invasion and metastasis risk of breast cancer. It was speculated that the combined detection of 14-3-3 zeta and HER2 would be one of the key factors affecting the clinical treatment decision and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据