4.4 Article

Metformin improves the therapeutic efficacy of low-dose albendazole against experimental alveolar echinococcosis

期刊

PARASITOLOGY
卷 149, 期 1, 页码 138-144

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182021001633

关键词

Albendazole; alveolar echinococcosis; in vivo combination treatment; metformin

资金

  1. CONICET [11220150100406]
  2. ANPCyT [0950]
  3. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata [EXA 963/20, EXA964/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that combination therapy with Met and ABZ offers an alternative to improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of high-dose ABZ monotherapy currently employed against alveolar echinococcosis (AE).
Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a severe disease caused by Echinococcus multilocularis. Its chemotherapeutic treatment is based on benzimidazoles, which are rarely curative and cause several adverse effects. Therefore, it is necessary to develop alternative and safer chemotherapeutic strategies against AE. It has previously been shown that metformin (Met) exhibits considerable in vivo activity on an early-infection model of AE when administered at 50 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 8 weeks. Here, the challenge is heightened by a 2-fold increase in parasite inoculum or by starting the treatment 6 weeks post-infection. In both cases, only the combination of Met (100 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) together with a sub-optimal dose of albendazole (ABZ) (5 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) led to a significant reduction in parasite weight compared to the untreated group. Coincidentally, drug combination showed the highest level of damage in E. multilocularis metacestodes. Likewise, Met alone or combined with ABZ led to a decrease in parasite glucose availability, which was evidenced as a lower intracystic glucose concentration. Therefore, the results demonstrate that combination therapy with Met and ABZ offers an alternative to improve the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of the high-dose ABZ monotherapy currently employed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据