4.5 Review

Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice

期刊

PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 30-43

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02692163211049309

关键词

Pain measurement; pain assessment; palliative care; paediatrics

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme [PB-PG-0317-20036]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0317-20036] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study systematically reviewed and evaluated the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools in pediatric palliative care, recommending FPS-R for self-assessment, and FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP for observational use in their respective age groups.
Background: Assessing pain in infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions remains a challenge due to diverse patient conditions, types of pain and often a reduced ability or inability of patients to communicate verbally. Aim: To systematically identify pain assessment tools that are currently used in paediatric palliative care and examine their psychometric properties and feasibility and make recommendations for clinical practice. Design: A systematic literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties of pain assessment tools of original peer-reviewed research published from inception of data sources to April 2021. Data sources: PsycINFO via ProQuest, Web of Science Core, Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, BIOSIS and CINAHL were searched from inception to April 2021. Hand searches of reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were performed. Results: From 1168 articles identified, 201 papers were selected for full-text assessment. Thirty-four articles met the eligibility criteria and we examined the psychometric properties of 22 pain assessment tools. Overall, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) had high cross-cultural validity, construct validity (hypothesis testing) and responsiveness; while the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale and Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had high internal consistency, criterion validity, reliability and responsiveness. The number of studies per psychometric property of each pain assessment tool was limited and the methodological quality of included studies was low. Conclusion: Balancing aspects of feasibility and psychometric properties, the FPS-R is recommended for self-assessment, and the FLACC scale/FLACC Revised and PPP are the recommended observational tools in their respective age groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据