4.3 Review

The Potential Mechanisms by which Artemisinin and Its Derivatives Induce Ferroptosis in the Treatment of Cancer

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1458143

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Strategic Cooperation Project of the Luzhou People's Government and Southwest Medical University [2019LZXNYDJ34]
  2. Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [S202010632282]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artemisinin and its derivatives have shown antitumor effects in addition to their antimalarial properties. The mechanisms of antitumor activity involve cell cycle regulation, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, DNA damage, and induction of ferroptosis. This review focuses on the potential of artemisinin derivatives in regulating ferroptosis and provides a basis for their use as anticancer drugs in clinical practice.
Artemisinin (ART) is a bioactive molecule derived from the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua (Asteraceae). ART and artemisinin derivatives (ARTs) have been effectively used for antimalaria treatment. The structure of ART is composed of a sesquiterpene lactone, including a peroxide internal bridge that is essential for its activity. In addition to their well-known antimalarial effects, ARTs have been shown recently to resist a wide range of tumors. The antineoplastic mechanisms of ART mainly include cell cycle inhibition, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, DNA damage, and ferroptosis. In particular, ferroptosis is a novel nonapoptotic type of programmed cell death. However, the antitumor mechanisms of ARTs by regulating ferroptosis remain unclear. Through this review, we focus on the potential antitumor function of ARTs by acting on ferroptosis, including the regulation of iron metabolism, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). This article systematically reviews the recent progress in ferroptosis research and provides a basis for ARTs as an anticancer drug in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据