4.3 Article

Geniposide Attenuates Hyperglycemia-Induced Oxidative Stress and Inflammation by Activating the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in Experimental Diabetic Retinopathy

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9247947

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82000911]
  2. Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau [SYSD2020072]
  3. project of Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [BK20200209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory product Geniposide (GEN) plays an important role in the treatment of diabetes and diabetic complications, particularly in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Through the Nrf2 pathway, GEN inhibits ROS accumulation and inflammatory responses, protecting Muller cells and the blood-retinal barrier in mice with DR from damage caused by hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress and inflammation.
Geniposide (GEN) is a natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory product and plays an important role in the treatment of diabetes and diabetic complications. To explore the biological functions and mechanism of GEN in diabetic retinopathy (DR), we constructed the in vitro and in vivo model of DR by using primary cultured mouse retinal Muller cells and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. We found that GEN inhibited ROS accumulation, NF-kappa B activation, Muller cell activation, and inflammatory cytokine secretion both in vitro and in vivo, which is probably mediated through the Nrf2 pathway. Exendin (9-39) (EX-9), an antagonist of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), abolished the protective effect of GEN on high glucose- (HG-) induced Muller cells. Additionally, GEN decreased hyperglycemia-induced damage to Muller cells and blood-retinal barrier in the retinas of mice with DR. We demonstrated that GEN was capable of protecting Muller cells and mice from HG-induced oxidative stress and inflammation, which is mostly dependent on the Nrf2 signaling pathway through GLP-1R. GEN may be an effective approach for the treatment of DR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据