4.3 Article

Activation of AdipoR1 with rCTRP9 Preserves BBB Integrity through the APPL1/AMPK/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in ICH Mice

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/2801263

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the protective effect of activating AdipoR1 with rCTRP9 on BBB integrity in ICH mice. rCTRP9 treatment improved neurological functions and reduced BBB permeability through the APPL1/AMPK/Nrf2 signaling pathway.
Background. The disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB) is the key factor leading to neurological impairment after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) injury. Adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) has an important effect contributing to the integrity of BBB. As a homologue of adiponectin, recombinant C1q/TNF-related protein 9 (rCTRP9) has neuroprotective effect in cerebrovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of AdipoR1 activation with rCTRP9 on BBB integrity after ICH injury and the potential mechanisms. Methods. 177 male mice were subjected in this study. ICH was induced by injecting collagenase into the right basal ganglia. rCTRP9 was treated intranasally at 1 hour after ICH. Selective siRNA was administered prior to ICH. Western blot, immunofluorescence staining, neurobehavioral tests, and BBB permeability were evaluated. Results. ICH increased the expression of endogenous AdipoR1 and CTRP9. Administration of rCTRP9 ameliorated neurological deficits and reduced the BBB permeability at 24 hours in ICH mice. Furthermore, rCTRP9 promoted the expression of AdipoR1, APPL1, p-AMPK, Nrf2, and tight junctional proteins. The intervention of specific siRNA of AdipoR1, APPL1, and p-AMPK reversed the protective effects of rCTRP9. Conclusions. Activation of AdipoR1 with rCTRP9 improved neurological functions and preserved BBB integrity through the APPL1/AMPK/Nrf2 signaling pathway in ICH mice. Therefore, CTRP9 could serve as a promising therapeutic method to alleviate BBB injury following ICH in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据