4.5 Article

Soil chemistry, temperature and bacterial community composition drive brGDGT distributions along a subarctic elevation gradient

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2021.104346

关键词

brGDGT; Biomarker proxy; Bacterial community; Soil biomarkers

资金

  1. Research Fund of the University of Antwerp [BOF/FFB180030]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders [12P1819N]
  3. ERC H2020 Marie Skodowska-Curie Actions [707270/WISLAS]
  4. EU INTERACT Arctic Access program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between brGDGT lipids and environmental conditions is complex, with influences from both temperature and soil chemistry. Soil pH has been found to be a better predictor of brGDGT values than temperature, indicating its importance as an environmental driver of brGDGT distribution. Further research is needed to fully understand the interplay between temperature, soil chemistry, and bacterial community composition in the development of the brGDGT proxy as a paleothermometer.
Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs) are bacterial membrane lipids which can be used to reconstruct past terrestrial mean annual air temperature (MAAT) and soil pH values. To reconstruct these environmental conditions in geological archives, we make use of the brGDGT ratios MBT'(5ME), CBT' and IR, which summarize the structural variation in brGDGT lipids. However, the most recent calibrations between the brGDGT-based temperature proxy MBT'(5ME) and temperature on a global scale are characterized by a residual error between 3.8 degrees C and 6.0 degrees C. This lack of accuracy of the MBT'(5ME)-MAAT calibration is often attributed to the difference between soil and atmospheric temperatures. Also, previous studies suggested that the variation of the MBT'(5ME) along chemistry and temperature gradients reflects a possible influence of bacterial community changes. Here, we analyzed the effect environmental variables have on brGDGT signatures collected along five elevation gradients in the north of Sweden and Norway, where MAAT changed between -4.7 degrees C and 2.7 degrees C and soil pH varies between 3.3 and 5.7. Specifically, we determined the impact of air and soil temperature, the bacterial community composition and soil chemical characteristics. The range of MBT'(5ME) values encountered (0.30-0.70) results in a wide range of reconstructed temperatures (1-13 degrees C). The use of in situ soil temperature data spanning one year did not improve the correlation with brGDGT MBT'(5ME) values, compared to using a longterm MAAT dataset. Although a temperature gradient was present, soil chemistry apparently determined brGDGTs concentration and distribution on this local scale. Specifically, soils with high cation exchange capacity (CEC) showed an increased concentration of brGDGT Ia, resulting in increased Community Index (CI) and MBT'(5ME) values, both brGDGT ratios that reflect the degree of methylation. Soils with increased pH (pH range 5-6) had a distinct brGDGT fingerprint with generally decreased MBT'(5ME) values, which resulted in the correlation between MBT'(5ME) and soil pH (r = -0.60, p < 0.01). Contrary to expectations, pH was a better predictor of MBT'(5ME) values than temperature (r = 0.47, r = 0. 44, p < 0.01, with MAAT and mean summer soil temperature (MSST), respectively). Soil pH also shaped the bacterial community composition, and a bio-indicator approach was used to narrow down the proposed bacterial producer of brGDGT lipids in high CI (Acidobacteria subgroups 1 and 3) and high pH soils (Acidobacteria subgroups 6 and 7). Building upon previous research, this confirms that brGDGTs respond to similar changes in bacterial community composition across sites. Because of the interplay between temperature and soil chemistry, the relationship between the MBT'(5ME) and soil temperature is clearly complex at the local scale. Further disentangling these environmental drivers is still essential in the development of the MBT'(5ME) proxy as paleothermometer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据