4.6 Article

Four- and two-armed hetero porphyrin dimers: their specific recognition and self-sorting behaviours

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 387-395

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ob01694f

关键词

-

资金

  1. JURC at ICR, Kyoto University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The self-assembled four-armed porphyrin hetero dimer capsule Cap4, stabilized through amidinium-carboxylate salt bridges, exhibited greater kinetic and thermodynamic stability compared to the corresponding two-armed dimer Cap2. The number of arms strongly influenced the recognition behavior, with small aromatic guests preferring Cap2 and large aromatic guests predominantly encapsulated by Cap4. Additionally, the number of arms enabled self-sorting behavior in dimer formation.
In this study we self-assembled the four-armed porphyrin hetero dimer capsule Cap4, stabilized through amidinium-carboxylate salt bridges, in CH2Cl2 and CHCl3. The dimer capsule Cap4 was kinetically and thermodynamically more stable than the corresponding two-armed dimer Cap2. The number of arms strongly influenced their recognition behaviour; guests possessing small aromatic faces (e.g., 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene) preferred residing in the cavity of the two-armed capsule Cap2, rather than in Cap4, both thermodynamically and kinetically; in contrast, large aromatic guests (e.g., 9,10-dibromoanthracene) were encapsulated predominantly by Cap4 because of favourable entropic effects. The number of arms enabled self-sorting behaviour of the dimer formation; complexation studies using an equimolar mixture of the four porphyrin constituents of the two capsules revealed the quantitative formation of the corresponding dimers Cap2 and Cap4. Furthermore, we examined the specific molecular recognition of Cap2 and Cap4; NMR experiments of mixtures of Cap2 and Cap4 in the presence of favourable guests for Cap2 and Cap4 revealed that these guest molecules were encapsulated selectively by their preferred hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据