4.6 Article

Nomogram-aided individual induction chemotherapy regimen selection in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105555

关键词

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Induction chemotherapy; Nomogram; Prognosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82002981]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the efficacy of TPF, TP, and PF induction chemotherapy regimens for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with different risk levels. Results showed that TPF was more effective for high-risk patients, while PF may be a better option for low-risk patients due to lower toxicities.
Objective: We undertook this study to clarify how TPF, TP and PF induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens benefit for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with different risk of disease progression. Materials and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, stage III-IVA NPC were included. A quantitative nomogram was built using the independent prognostic factors identified for disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups by the nomogram. Survival outcomes and toxicities between different IC regimens were compared. Results: In total, 1647 (41.0%), 1123 (28.0%) and 1242 (31.0%) patients received TPF, PF and TP regimen, respectively. Consequently, 2253 (56.2%) patients were clarified as low-risk group and the other 1759 (43.8%) as high-risk group. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between TPF, PF and TP regimens within the low-risk group. However, TPF was associated with significantly improved 3-year DFS (76.2% vs. 67.5% vs. 68.3%), overall survival (88.3% vs. 84.1% vs. 83.9%), distant metastasis-free survival (81.9% vs. 75.0% vs. 77.4%) and locoregional relapse-free survival (92.0% vs. 87.5% vs. 86.9%; all P < 0.05) compared with PF and TP within high-risk group. Multivariate analysis also confirmed these findings. Toxicity analysis showed that TP regimen has the highest percentage of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities while PF regimen achieved the lowest percentages of overall grade 3-5 adverse events. Conclusions: Patients with high risk should receive TPF for better efficacy and PF may be a better choice for low risk patients with regard to less grade 3-5 toxicities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据