4.5 Article

All optical switching and the optical nonlinear properties of 4-(benzothiazolyldiazenyl)-3-chlorophenyl 4-(nonylthio)benzoate (EB-3Cl)

期刊

OPTIK
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168196

关键词

DRPs; Z-scan; INR; OLg; Fresnel-Kirchhoff integral

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, chemical computational calculations were conducted using density functional theory (DFT) to investigate the molecular structure of a synthesized compound, revealing good optical properties in agreement with experimental findings. The nonlinear refraction index (INR) of the compound was determined via two methods, and its optical limiting (OLg) properties were studied. Additionally, all optical switching technique was tested with successful results obtained, and diffraction ring patterns (DRPs) were numerically simulated based on the Fresnel-Kirchhoff integral.
Chemical computational calculations are carried out to investigate the molecular structure of 4-(benzothiazolyldiazenyl)-3-chlorophenyl 4-(nonylthio)benzoate (EB-3Cl) via the density functional theory (DFT) method. The B3LYP method is used to optimize the geometrical structure of the EB-3Cl compound with 6-31G(d,p) basis set level. HOMO-LUMO energies and some nonlinear optical (NLO) properties are calculated via the same method used in geometry optimization. The results show that the synthesized compound has good optical properties. Good agreement correlations of experimental and theoretical findings are found. The index of nonlinear refraction (INR) of EB-3Cl is determined via two methods, the diffraction ring pattern (DRP) and the Z-scan. High INR value of 5.92 x 10(-7) cm(2)/W is obtained via the first method. Optical limiting (OLg), of the synthesized compound is studied with OLg threshold value of 8 mW is obtained. All optical switching technique is tested in the prepared compound with good results are obtained and DRPs are simulated numerically based on the Fresnel-Kirchhoff integral.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据