4.5 Article

Fractional thermal wave bio-heat equation based analysis for living biological tissue with non-Fourier Neumann boundary condition in laser pulse heating

期刊

OPTIK
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167811

关键词

Fractional thermal wave bio-heat transfer; Fractional derivative; Cattaneo-Vernotte model; Non-Fourier Neumann boundary condition

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11372281]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China [LQ18E090007]
  3. Science and Technology Plan Project of Zhoushan [2016C41009, 2017C41002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the heat transfer mechanisms in living biological tissue during pulse laser irradiation using different heat transfer equations, revealing that the FTWBT model has advantages in describing bio-heat transfer in laser therapy. The results discuss the heat wave propagation characteristics in biological tissues and highlight the importance of correct boundary conditions for model accuracy.
In the present paper, the different heat transfer mechanisms in living biological tissue during pulse laser irradiation are studied with the fractional thermal wave bio-heat transfer (FTWBT) equation, the thermal wave bio-heat transfer (TWBT) equation and the Pennes bio-heat transfer (PBT) equation, respectively. The corresponding non-Fourier boundary condition is established and the analytical solutions based on the three models are obtained by employing the Fourier and Laplace transform methods. The heat wave propagation characteristics in biological tissues are revealed and discussed in detail. The results show that the FTWBT model has advantages over the others to describe the bio-heat transfer in laser therapy as long as the boundary condition is correct. The heat transfer predicted by the FTWBT model reveals the thermal diffusion feature as well as the thermal wave behavior, which is dependent on the fractional order parameter and biological tissue relaxation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据