4.7 Article

Online approximate solution of HJI equation for unknown constrained-input nonlinear continuous-time systems

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 328, 期 -, 页码 435-454

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.001

关键词

Adaptive dynamic programming; Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs equation; Input constraint; Neural network; Optimal control; Reinforcement learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61034002, 61233001, 61273140, 61304086, 61374105]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4132078]
  3. Early Career Development Award of the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems (SKLMCCS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is concerned with the approximate solution of Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs (HJI) equation for constrained-input nonlinear continuous-time systems with unknown dynamics. We develop a novel online adaptive dynamic programming-based algorithm to learn the solution of the HJI equation. The present algorithm is implemented via an identifier-critic architecture, which consists of two neural networks (NNs): an identifier NN is applied to estimate the unknown system dynamics and a critic NN is constructed to obtain the approximate solution of the HJI equation. An advantage of the proposed architecture is that the identifier NN and the critic NN are tuned simultaneously. With introducing two additional terms, namely, the stabilizing term and the robustifying term to update the critic NN, the initial stabilizing control is no longer required. Meanwhile, the developed critic tuning rule not only ensures convergence of the critic to the optimal saddle point but also guarantees stability of the closed-loop system. Moreover, the uniform ultimate boundedness of the weights of the identifier NN and the critic NN are proved by using Lyapunov's direct method. Finally, to illustrate the effectiveness and applicability of the developed approach, two simulation examples are provided. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据