4.6 Article

Ultralow-frequency ultranarrow-bandwidth coherent terahertz imaging for nondestructive testing of mortar material

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 4392-4401

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.449092

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19H00871, 21K04928]
  2. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K04928, 19H00871] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an ultralow-frequency, ultranarrow-bandwidth, coherent terahertz imaging system based on THz-TDS was constructed for nondestructive testing of concrete materials. The system achieved a wide dynamic range of THz power and high resolution, enabling visualization of the inner structure of thick concrete structures.
Nondestructive testing of concrete materials is essential in civil engineering to maintain social infrastructure such as buildings or bridges. In this study, we constructed an ultralow-frequency, ultranarrow-bandwidth, coherent terahertz (THz) imaging system based on THz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS). Based on its ultralow-frequency-localized THz wave and coherent detection, the present system achieved a wide dynamic range of THz power over 100 dB at 0.046 THz, which is appropriate to measure the mortar material. The achieved dynamic range of the THz power was 59 dB larger than that of a commercialized THz-TDS system and 49 dB larger than that of an ultralow-frequency noncoherent THz imaging system equipped with a high-power electric THz source. Ultimately, the proposed system could visualize the inner structure of a mortar sample with a thickness of 10 mm, and the present system can investigate a mortar sample with a thickness of over 130 mm. The proposed method is an attractive tool for non-destructive testing of thick concrete structures characterized by non-invasiveness and non-contact remoteness. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据