4.6 Article

Designing high-performance propagation-compressing spaceplates using thin-film multilayer stacks

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 2197-2205

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.443067

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Canada First Research Excellence Fund (Transformative Quantum Technologies)
  2. Canada Research Chairs (Canada Research Chairs Program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of metasurfaces has enabled portable and functional flat optical devices. Spaceplates, as a complementary element, reduce the space between metalenses and further miniaturize imaging devices. This study employs inverse-design techniques to explore the behavior of thin-film-based spaceplates and discovers a tradeoff between the compression factor and the numerical aperture. Even simple designs with realistic materials can achieve capable spaceplates for monochromatic applications.
The development of metasurfaces has enabled unprecedented portability and functionality in flat optical devices. Spaceplates have recently been introduced as a complementary element to reduce the space between individual metalenses, which will further miniaturize entire imaging devices. However, spaceplates necessitate an optical response which depends on the transverse spatial frequency component of a light field - therefore making it challenging both to design them and to assess their ultimate performance and potential. Here, we employ inverse-design techniques to explore the behaviour of general thin-film-based spaceplates. We observe a tradeoff between the compression factor R and the numerical aperture NA of such devices; we obtained a compression factor of R = 5.5 for devices with an NA = 0.42, and up to a record R = 340 with NA of 0.017. Our work illustrates that even simple designs consisting of realistic materials (i.e., silicon and glass) permit capable spaceplates for monochromatic applications. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据