4.5 Article

Self-correction of air refractive index in distance measurement using two-color sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry

期刊

OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 505, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127521

关键词

Air refractive index correction; Two-color method; Sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry; Distance measurement

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhe-jiang Province, China [LQ19E050017, LZ18E050003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51905491, 51875530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a two-color sinusoidal phase modulating interferometer based on an electro-optic modulator for self-correction of air refractive index in distance measurement. Experimental results indicated that using the two-color interferometer reduced drift compared to one-color interferometers in dynamic environments.
A two-color sinusoidal phase modulating (SPM) interferometer based on electro-optic modulator (EOM) is devised for self-correction of air refractive index in distance measurement. Two laser sources with high frequency stability and close wavelengths (633 nm and 782 nm) are used in this scheme. High-accuracy phase demodulation was realized using phase generated carrier (PGC) demodulation techniques with an FPGAbased signal processing board. Experimental results of nanometer displacement measurements show that the resolution and accuracy of PGC demodulation is better than 1 degrees, and the nonlinear error is less than 0.2 degrees. Performance tests of two-color SPM interferometer compared with one-color interferometers under dynamic environment were implemented with an arm length difference of 4 m. The results show that, the measured distance of one-color interferometer drifts 4.8 mu m in 600 s, which is caused by the deviation between the measured value of air refractive index and the actual value along the laser propagation path, and this drift reduces to +/- 1.5 mu m using two-color interferometer without environmental sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据