4.7 Article

Experimental study on the interaction between oblique incident blast stress wave and static crack by dynamic photoelasticity

期刊

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106764

关键词

Oblique incident; Blast stress wave; Dynamic photoelasticity; Epoxy resin plate

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004290]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680354]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-20072A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the interaction between oblique incident blast stress wave and prefabricated crack using dynamic photoelastic method and numerical simulation method. Experimental results show that the incident angle of blast stress wave significantly influences the interaction with the crack and stress field at the crack tip. Numerical models based on experimental results demonstrate good agreement with photoelastic experiments, validating the analysis.
In this paper, the interaction between the oblique incident blast stress wave and the prefabricated crack is studied using the dynamic photoelastic method and numerical simulation method. First, blast loading dynamic photoelastic experiment system is established. Second, blast stress wave and crack interaction experiments are carried out. Epoxy resin plate is used as specimen material, while lead azide explosive is used to apply blasting load. In the experiment, the evolution of stress field at crack wall and crack tip are observed by a high-speed camera. The experimental results show that incident angle of blast stress wave has a great influence on the way the stress wave interacts with the crack and the field at the crack tip. Finally, based on the experimental results, two numerical models are conducted using FEM software. The numerical results of stress field are in good agreement with photoelastic experiment, which verifies the experimental analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据