4.6 Article

Nitrogen, sulfur co-doped red carbon dots for sensitive and selective detection of Sn2+ ions

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111543

关键词

Carbon dots; Heteroatoms doping; Red excitation and emission; Detection

资金

  1. Open Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry [SKLEAC201906]
  2. Natural Scientific Foundation of China [51473082]
  3. State Key Project of International Cooperation Research [2017YFE0108300, 2016YFE0110800]
  4. Shandong Double-Hundred Project (2018)
  5. National Plan for Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 plan)
  6. 1st Class Discipline Program of Shandong Province of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel R-CDs with strong red emission were successfully synthesized and utilized as a selective and sensitive turn-off sensor for Sn2+ detection. The R-CDs demonstrated effective electron, charge or energy transfer between excitons and Sn2+ through non-radiative recombination, enabling detection with a high range and low limit.
Carbon dots with both red-emission and red-excitation (R-CDs) have attracted much attention due to their excellent optical property and promising application in various fields. However, most carbon dots (CDs) with redemission are only excited with short wavelength irradiation, which heavily hinders their further applications. Herein, novel R-CDs are obtained through a hydrothermal synthesis by using p-phenylenediamine and ammonium thiocyanate as precursors. The as-synthesized R-CDs exhibit a strong red emission at 618 nm at a long excitation (598 nm). Moreover, the R-CDs are explored as a selective and sensitive turn-off sensor for Sn2+ detection by the non-radiative recombination of the excitons through effective electron, charge or energy transfer between Sn2+ and surface functional groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, amine, thiophene, and S=O, with a detection range from 0 to 90 mu M and a detection limit of as low as 17.25 nM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据