4.7 Article

Evolutionary fuzzy k-nearest neighbors algorithm using interval-valued fuzzy sets

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 144-163

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.007

关键词

Fuzzy nearest neighbor; Interval-valued fuzzy sets; Evolutionary algorithms; Supervised learning; Classification

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [TIN2014-57251-P]
  2. Andalusian Government [P10-TIC-06858, P11-TIC-7765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most known and effective methods in supervised classification is the k-nearest neighbors classifier. Several approaches have been proposed to enhance its precision, with the fuzzy k-nearest neighbors (fuzzy-kNN) classifier being among the most successful ones. However, despite its good behavior, fuzzy-kNN lacks of a method for properly defining several mechanisms regarding the representation of the relationship between the instances and the classes of the classification problems. Such a method would be very desirable, since it would potentially lead to an improvement in the precision of the classifier. In this work we present a new approach, evolutionary fuzzy k-nearest neighbors classifier using interval-valued fuzzy sets (EF-kNN-IVFS), incorporating interval-valued fuzzy sets for computing the memberships of training instances in fuzzy-kNN. It is based on the representation of multiple choices of two key parameters of fuzzy-kNN: one is applied in the definition of the membership function, and the other is used in the computation of the voting rule. Besides, evolutionary search techniques are incorporated to the model as a self-optimization procedure for setting up these parameters. An experimental study has been carried out to assess the capabilities of our approach. The study has been validated by using nonparametric statistical tests, and remarks the strong performance of EF-kNN-IVFS compared with several state of the art techniques in fuzzy nearest neighbor classification. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据