4.7 Article

Improved ELOS based path following control for underactuated surface vessels with roll constraint

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110348

关键词

Underactuated; ELOS; Roll; Path following; Adaptive; Backstepping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve the path following control of underactuated surface vessels by using an improved extended state observer based line-of-sight method. The research shows that the guidance law and course tracking accuracy can be affected by large roll motion and nonzero drift angle, and both factors should be considered when designing the path following control system. The robustness of the tracking control system is enhanced by handling system dynamic uncertainty and external random disturbances.
This study aims to the path following control of underactuated surface vessels with an improved extended state observer based line-of-sight (ELOS). The large roll motion and nonzero drift angle can affect the guidance law and the course tracking accuracy in rough waves, the two factors should be considered when the path following control system is designed. The robustness of the tracking control system is enhanced by handling the system dynamic uncertainty and external random disturbances. First, the roll motion based track error dynamics are established, then a reduced order extended state observer is applied to estimate the time varying drift angle, and the adaptive heading guidance law is proposed. Finally, a robust adaptive heading control law is developed by combining dynamic surface control, sliding mode control and backstepping techniques. The ELOS based path following control methodology can ensure that all estimation and track errors are uniformly ultimately bounded. Simulations were used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller by comparing it with sliding mode control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据