4.7 Article

Combining keypoint-based and segment-based features for counting people in crowded scenes

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 199-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.060

关键词

People counting; Crowd counting; Interest points; Keypoints; Occlusion; Video surveillance

资金

  1. Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University [217/D/12140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The counting of the number of people within a scene is a practical machine vision task, and it has been considered as an important application for security purposes. Most of the people counting algorithms generally extract the foreground segments and map the number of people to some features such as foreground area, texture, or edge count. Keypoint-based approaches, on the other hand, have also been proposed, which involves the use of statistical features of keypoints, such as the number of moving keypoints to estimate the crowd size. In contrast to the foreground segment-based methods, keypoint-based approaches are not sensitive to background changes, illuminations, occlusions, and shadows. However, they have limited performance due to the lack of sufficient features. In this paper, in order to estimate the crowd count, the combination of keypoint-based and segment-based (foreground) features is proposed. However, the whole approach is based on the keypoints and not all the image pixels. The proposed method, firstly, extracts the salient keypoints in the scene. Then, foreground segments are obtained by a simple morphological operation on the moving keypoints and hence the system does not suffer from difficulties associated with foreground/background segmentation. Various features are extracted from each foreground segment together with the corresponding keypoints which are highly correlated with the size, density, and occlusion level of the crowd. Finally, a combination of the segment-based and keypoint-based features is used to estimate the number of people in crowds. The experiment demonstrates that the proposed method achieves lower counting error rates compared to the existing approaches. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据