4.5 Article

Effects of fresh mango consumption on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adults

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.11.001

关键词

Mangos; Antioxidants; Cardiovascular disease; Glucose; Lipid profile; Inflammation

资金

  1. National Mango Board, United States [603024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that compared to a control snack, mangos may improve certain risk factors associated with overweight and obesity, including improved glycemic control and reduced inflammation.
Background & aims: In vitro and animal studies show antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective properties of mangos. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of fresh mango consumption compared to an isocaloric control snack on body weight, glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, liver function enzymes, inflammation, and antioxidant activity in over-weight and obese adults (BMI >26 kg/m(2)). Methods and results: In a crossover design, 27 participants consumed 100 kcal/d of fresh mangos or isocaloric low-fat cookies daily for 12 weeks each, separated by a four-week washout period. Blood glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), and aspartate transaminase activity significantly decreased while total antioxidant capacity significantly increased following mango consumption. There were no significant changes in body weight, body fat %, blood pressure, insulin, or lipid profile following mango consumption. Cookie consumption significantly increased body weight, insulin, CRP, and triglycerides. Conclusion: These results suggest that relative to the control snack, mangos may improve certain risk factors associated with overweight and obesity including improved glycemic control and reduced inflammation. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据