4.6 Article

Key strategies in scholarly writing instruction for doctor of nursing practice students: A Q-methodology study

期刊

NURSE EDUCATION TODAY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105192

关键词

Authorship; Academic writing; Peer review; Professional competence; Q-Sort; Scholarly communication; Self-assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to inform instructional design choices and teaching strategies for DNP writing courses by examining student viewpoints before and after completing a scholarly writing course. The results indicated that students had different viewpoints on scholarly writing knowledge, skills, and attitudes before and after the course. Therefore, effective instruction in scholarly writing should include explicitly directed pre-writing activities, frequent opportunities to give and receive feedback, and training on management of emotional aspects of writing.
Background: Development of scholarly writing skills in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students is essential to their capacity to advance nursing science after graduation. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to inform instructional design choices and teaching strategies for DNP writing courses by examining student viewpoints before and after completing a scholarly writing course. Design: Q methodology was used to explore student self-perceptions of scholarly writing skills. Setting: An online scholarly writing course at a large university in the midwestern United States. Participants: Twenty-six DNP students with either a bachelor's or master's degree in nursing. Methods: Before and after a scholarly writing course, students ranked 34 writing competency statements according to how well the statements described them. Results: Three pre-course and four post-course factors represented student viewpoints of their scholarly writing knowledge, skills, and attitudes before and after a writing course. Conclusions: Effective instruction in scholarly writing for DNPs should include explicitly directed pre-writing activities, frequent opportunities to give and receive feedback, and training on management of emotional aspects of writing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据