4.8 Article

Computational investigation of the impact of core sequence on immobile DNA four-way junction structure and dynamics

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 717-730

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army Research Office [MURI] [W911NF-12-1-0420]
  2. Office of Naval Research [ONR] [N00014-12-1-0621, N00014-13-1-0664, N00014-21-14013]
  3. National Science Foundation [MCB-9604568, CCF1956054]
  4. Will Bricker - UNM Startup/Mark Bathe - ONR [N00014-21-1-4013]
  5. NSF [CCF-1956054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, molecular dynamics simulations were used to investigate the base-pair level structure and dynamics of four-way junctions, revealing the significant impact of base sequence on local structure, isomer bias, and global junction dynamics.
Immobile four-way junctions (4WJs) are core structural motifs employed in the design of programmed DNA assemblies. Understanding the impact of sequence on their equilibrium structure and flexibility is important to informing the design of complex DNA architectures. While core junction sequence is known to impact the preferences for the two possible isomeric states that junctions reside in, previous investigations have not quantified these preferences based on molecular-level interactions. Here, we use all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to investigate base-pair level structure and dynamics of four-way junctions, using the canonical Seeman J1 junction as a reference. Comparison of J1 with equivalent single-crossover topologies and isolated nicked duplexes reveal conformational impact of the double-crossover motif. We additionally contrast J1 with a second junction core sequence termed J24, with equal thermodynamic preference for each isomeric configuration. Analyses of the base-pair degrees of freedom for each system, free energy calculations, and reduced-coordinate sampling of the 4WJ isomers reveal the significant impact base sequence has on local structure, isomer bias, and global junction dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据