4.8 Article

m5C-Atlas: a comprehensive database for decoding and annotating the 5-methylcytosine (m5C) epitranscriptome

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 D1, 页码 D196-D203

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1075

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671373]
  2. XJTLU Key Program Special Fund [KSF-T-01, KSF-E-51, KSF-P-02]
  3. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paragraph introduces a database called m(5)C-Atlas, which contains information on 166,540 m(5)C sites from 13 different species. It provides data on methylation levels under specific conditions and some novel features for exploring the m(5)C epitranscriptomes.
Y 5-Methylcytosine (m(5)C) is one of the most prevalent covalent modifications on RNA. It is known to regulate a broad variety of RNA functions, including nuclear export, RNA stability and translation. Here, we present m(5)C-Atlas, a database for comprehensive collection and annotation of RNA 5-methylcytosine. The database contains 166 540 m(5)C sites in 13 species identified from 5 base-resolution epitranscriptome profiling technologies. Moreover, condition-specific methylation levels are quantified from 351 RNA bisulfite sequencing samples gathered from 22 different studies via an integrative pipeline. The database also presents several novel features, such as the evolutionary conservation of a m(5)C locus, its association with SNPs, and any relevance to RNA secondary structure. All m(5)C-atlas data are accessible through a user-friendly interface, in which the m(5)C epitranscriptomes can be freely explored, shared, and annotated with putative post-transcriptional mechanisms (e.g. RBP intermolecular interaction with RNA, microRNA interaction and splicing sites). Together, these resources offer unprecedented opportunities for exploring m(5)C epitranscriptomes. The m(5)C-Atlas database is freely accessible at https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/biologicalsciences/m5c-atlas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据