4.8 Article

TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 D1, 页码 D801-D807

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich TRR 51]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial systematics is influenced by genome-based methods and faces challenges from the increasing number of taxon names and associated sequences. Accurate and reliable high-throughput platforms like LPSN and TYGS are essential for handling the data efficiently. The updates include new features and expanded database content to provide easy access to the data.
Microbial systematics is heavily influenced by genome-based methods and challenged by an ever increasing number of taxon names and associated sequences in public data repositories. This poses a challenge for database systems, particularly since it is obviously advantageous if such data are based on a globally recognized approach to manage names, such as the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. The amount of data can only be handled if accurate and reliable high-throughput platforms are available that are able to both comply with this demand and to keep track of all changes in an efficient and flexible way. The List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) is an expert-curated authoritative resource for prokaryotic nomenclature and is available at https://lpsn.dsmz.de. The Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) is a high-throughput platform for accurate genome-based taxonomy and is available at https://tygs.dsmz.de. We here present important updates of these two previously introduced, heavily interconnected platforms for taxonomic nomenclature and classification, including new high-level facilities providing access to bioinformatic algorithms, a considerable expansion of the database content, and new ways to easily access the data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据