4.8 Article

Ribosomal leaky scanning through a translated uORF requires eIF4G2

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 1111-1127

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1286

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00152]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00152] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

eIF4G2 is a translation initiation factor in higher eukaryotes that drives translation under stress when eIF4E activity is impaired. This study shows that eIF4G2 also plays a role in scanning process under normal conditions and replaces eIF4G1 during scanning of 5 ' UTR. It is crucial for higher eukaryotes with long 5 ' UTRs and frequent uORFs.
eIF4G2 (DAP5 or Nat1) is a homologue of the canonical translation initiation factor eIF4G1 in higher eukaryotes but its function remains poorly understood. Unlike eIF4G1, eIF4G2 does not interact with the cap-binding protein eIF4E and is believed to drive translation under stress when eIF4E activity is impaired. Here, we show that eIF4G2 operates under normal conditions as well and promotes scanning downstream of the eIF4G1-mediated 40S recruitment and cap-proximal scanning. Specifically, eIF4G2 facilitates leaky scanning for a subset of mRNAs. Apparently, eIF4G2 replaces eIF4G1 during scanning of 5 ' UTR and the necessity for eIF4G2 only arises when eIF4G1 dissociates from the scanning complex. In particular, this event can occur when the leaky scanning complexes interfere with initiating or elongating 80S ribosomes within a translated uORF. This mechanism is therefore crucial for higher eukaryotes which are known to have long 5 ' UTRs with highly frequent uORFs. We suggest that uORFs are not the only obstacle on the way of scanning complexes towards the main start codon, because certain eIF4G2 mRNA targets lack uORF(s). Thus, higher eukaryotes possess two distinct scanning complexes: the principal one that binds mRNA and initiates scanning, and the accessory one that rescues scanning when the former fails.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据