4.8 Article

Identification and classification of reverse transcriptases in bacterial genomes and metagenomes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lilly Endowment, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) play various roles in different systems in prokaryotes, but there is a lack of computational tools for their identification and characterization. Researchers developed a tool called myRT to identify and classify prokaryotic RTs, providing genomic neighborhood information.
Reverse transcriptases (RTs) are found in different systems including group II introns, Diversity Generating Retroelements (DGRs), retrons, CRISPR-Cas systems, and Abortive Infection (Abi) systems in prokaryotes. Different classes of RTs can play different roles, such as template switching and mobility in group II introns, spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems, mutagenic retrohoming in DGRs, programmed cell suicide in Abi systems, and recently discovered phage defense in retrons. While some classes of RTs have been studied extensively, others remain to be characterized. There is a lack of computational tools for identifying and characterizing various classes of RTs. In this study, we built a tool (called myRT) for identification and classification of prokaryotic RTs. In addition, our tool provides information about the genomic neighborhood of each RT, providing potential functional clues. We applied our tool to predict RTs in all complete and draft bacterial genomes, and created a collection that can be used for exploration of putative RTs and their associated protein domains. Application of myRT to metagenomes showed that gut metagenomes encode proportionally more RTs related to DGRs, outnumbering retron-related RTs, as compared to the collection of reference genomes. MyRT is both available as a standalone software (https://github.com/mgtools/myRT) and also through a website (https: //omics.informatics.indiana.edu/myRT/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据