4.8 Article

Nuclear export restricts Gdown1 to a mitotic function

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 1908-1926

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac015

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM126908]
  2. NIH [GM126908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the functional characterization of Gdown1 in human cells. It is found that Gdown1 predominantly resides in the cytoplasm of interphase cells and enters the nucleus at the onset of mitosis. Depletion of Gdown1 is associated with de-repression of mitotic transcription, aberrant mitoses, and activation of the p53 pathway.
Approximately half of purified mammalian RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is associated with a tightly interacting sub-stoichiometric subunit, Gdown1. Previous studies have established that Gdown1 inhibits transcription initiation through competitive interactions with general transcription factors and blocks the Pol II termination activity of transcription termination factor 2 (TTF2). However, the biological functions of Gdown1 remain poorly understood. Here, we utilized genetic, microscopic, and multi-omics approaches to functionally characterize Gdown1 in three human cell lines. Acute depletion of Gdown1 caused minimal direct effects on transcription. We show that Gdown1 resides predominantly in the cytoplasm of interphase cells, shuttles between the cytoplasm and nucleus, and is regulated by nuclear export. Gdown1 enters the nucleus at the onset of mitosis. Consistently, genetic ablation of Gdown1 is associated with partial de-repression of mitotic transcription, and Gdown1 KO cells present with evidence of aberrant mitoses coupled to p53 pathway activation. Evidence is presented demonstrating that Gdown1 modulates the combined functions of purified productive elongation factors PAF1C, RTF1, SPT6, DSIF and P-TEFb in vitro. Collectively, our findings support a model wherein the Pol II-regulatory function of Gdown1 occurs during mitosis and is required for genome integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据